week 3 hc 250 conflict resolutions

Swamped with your writing assignments? We'll take the academic weight off your shoulders. We complete all our papers from scratch. You can get a plagiarism report upon request just to confirm.


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper

In this week, you will explore traditional and contemporary conflict resolution theories (i.e., traditional view, the behavioral/ contemporary/ human relations view, and the interactionist view) and their merits and limitations.

  • Prepare a 10-slide PowerPoint

    presentation
    on the three theoretical underpinnings of conflict resolution in workplaces – traditional view, the behavioral/ contemporary/ human relations view, and the interactionist view.
  • Your assignment must be written in standard edited English per the APA guidelines.
  • Be sure to support your work with at least two high-quality references, including at least one from peer-reviewed journals accessed through the Herzing University Library or other sources.
  • Your assignment should show the effective

    application
    of triangulation of content and resources in your conclusion and recommendations.

Rubric

HC250 – Unit 3 Assignment

HC250 – Unit 3 Assignment

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

15.0 pts

5

Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors.

14.0 pts

4

Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement, thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed.

12.0 pts

3

Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial.

11.0 pts

2

Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement or related contextual factors.

9.0 pts

1

Demonstrates the ability to explain contextual facts but does not provide a defined statement.

0.0 pts

0

There is no evidence of a defined statement.

15.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis

20.0 pts

5

Organizes and compares evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

18.0 pts

4

Organizes and interprets evidence to reveal patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

16.0 pts

3

Organizes and describes evidence according to patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

14.0 pts

2

Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing patterns, differences, or similarities.

12.0 pts

1

Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/ or is unrelated to focus.

0.0 pts

0

Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/ or is unrelated to focus.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting

10.0 pts

5

The paper exhibits a excellent command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.

9.0 pts

4

The paper exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication.

8.0 pts

3

The paper exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication.

7.0 pts

2

The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.

6.0 pts

1

The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.

0.0 pts

0

The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA

5.0 pts

5

The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references.

4.5 pts

4

The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

4.0 pts

3

The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

3.5 pts

2

The required APA elements are not all included. AND/OR there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

3.0 pts

1

Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references.

0.0 pts

0

There is little to no evidence of APA formatting. AND/OR there are no in-text citations AND/OR references.

5.0 pts

Total Points: 50.0

Writerbay.net

We offer CUSTOM-WRITTEN, CONFIDENTIAL, ORIGINAL, and PRIVATE writing services. Kindly click on the ORDER NOW button to receive an A++ paper from our masters- and PhD writers.

Get a 10% discount on your order using the following coupon code SAVE10


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper