assignment week 2 influencing health policy

Are you stressed by poor grades and tight deadlines? We have your back at expert-tutor.net. We can do this or a different assignment for you at an affordable price. Use customdissertations.org writing services to score better and meet your deadlines.


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper

icon Agency Synopsis


Identify regulatory agencies that regulate health and the health care system within the US, create a table listing your 5 regulatory agencies and address the following:

  1. Describe the agency, level of regulatory authority (local, state, federal), scope of regulatory authority, and role within the US healthcare system.
  2. Address relevance of the organization or the organization’s authority to the APRN/DNP graduate.
  3. Describe relevance to specialty area, area of practice, or setting of practice. For an example, mental health.

Submission Requirements:

  • In the table, write the 3 criteria above and respond to them.
  • The table is to be clear and concise and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation and misspelling.
  • The table is to be complete and thorough. It should include all items indicated in the assignment.
  • Incorporate at least 3 current (published within last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work.
  • Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.

    Rubric

    Essay/Paper Rubric

    Essay/Paper Rubric
    CriteriaRatingsPts
    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
    Identification of Main Issues/Problems

    4.0 pts

    Distinguished
    Identify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues/problems.

    3.0 pts

    Excellent
    Identifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues/problems.

    2.0 pts

    Fair
    Identifies and demonstrate an an acceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.

    1.0 pts

    Poor
    Identifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.

    4.0 pts
    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
    Analysis and Evaluation of Issues/Probelms

    4.0 pts

    Distinguished
    Presents an insightful, thorough analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.

    3.0 pts

    Excellent
    Presents a thorough analysis and evaluation of most of the issues/problems.

    2.0 pts

    Fair
    Presents a superficial or incomplete analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.

    1.0 pts

    Poor
    Presents unacceptable analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.

    4.0 pts
    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
    Demonstrates a Conceptual Understanding

    4.0 pts

    Distinguished
    Provides a thorough, competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a high level of conceptual understanding.

    3.0 pts

    Excellent
    Provides a competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a moderate level of conceptual understanding.

    2.0 pts

    Fair
    Provides a competent responses to all issues/problems, but lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.

    1.0 pts

    Poor
    Provides an unacceptable response to all issues/problems, and lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.

    4.0 pts
    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
    Use of Citations to Course Readings and Additional Research/Literature

    4.0 pts

    Distinguished
    Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing.

    3.0 pts

    Excellent
    Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.

    2.0 pts

    Fair
    Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.

    1.0 pts

    Poor
    Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. An unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing.

    4.0 pts
    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
    Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines

    4.0 pts

    Full Marks
    Demonstrate a high level of clarity, precision, and attention to detail. APA style is correct and writing is free of grammar and spelling errors.

    3.0 pts

    Excellent
    Demonstrate a high level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.

    2.0 pts

    Fair
    Demonstrate a moderate level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.

    1.0 pts

    Poor
    Demonstrates issues in writing and communicating clearly. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention.

    4.0 pts

Writerbay.net

We offer CUSTOM-WRITTEN, CONFIDENTIAL, ORIGINAL, and PRIVATE writing services. Kindly click on the ORDER NOW button to receive an A++ paper from our masters- and PhD writers.

Get a 10% discount on your order using the following coupon code SAVE10


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper