Case study 5 pages apa seven references less than five years
Swamped with your writing assignments? We'll take the academic weight off your shoulders. We complete all our papers from scratch. You can get a plagiarism report upon request just to confirm.
Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper
Case study about picot question
similarity less than 15 %
Orientations. Case Study Part 1.
My question
PICOT (PICO) Question
In elderly patients suffering from osteoarthritis, how does water exercise compared to land exercise influence pain alleviation after two months ?
· 1. Introduction. Describe the health problem. Don’t type “Introduction”. (1 paragraph).
Using data and statistics, support your claim that the issue you selected is a problem.
What specifically will you address in your proposed health promotion program?
Be sure your proposed outcome is realistic and measurable.
2. Describe the vulnerable population. (1-2 paragraph).
What are the risk factors that make this a vulnerable population?
Use evidence to support the risk factors you have identified.
3. Provide a review of literature from scholarly journals (at least 2, one of those two should be systematic review supporting what you wish to accomplish) of evidence-based interventions that address the problem. (2 paragraph, one for each article).
After completing a literature search related to effective interventions for your chosen health promotion activity, write a review that evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of all the sources you have found and how this evidence supports your ideas.
4. Select and present an appropriate health promotion/disease prevention theoretical or conceptual model that best serves as the guiding framework for the proposal. (1-2 paragraph).
For this assignment a conclusion paragraph is not required.
Paper Requirements
Three to five pages in length (excluding title page, references, and appendices)
Follow APA format
Cite a minimum of five research articles, including the two sources you will use as body of evidence in the literature search, in point 3.
To view the Grading Rubric for this Assignment, please visit the Grading Rubrics section of the Course Home.
Assignment rubric
Case Study Part II
[100 Points Total]
A. Project Content
90 points possible |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
Score |
1. Describe the health problem. Using data and statistics, support your claim that the issue you selected is a problem. What specifically will you address in your proposed health promotion program? Be sure your proposed outcome is realistic and measureable |
Did not identified the problem |
Poorly identified the problem and aspect to address |
Vaguely identified and discussed the problem and aspect to address |
Briefly identified and discussed the problem and aspect to address
|
Thoroughly identified and discussed the problem and aspect to address |
|
2. Describe the vulnerable population. What are the risk factors that make this a vulnerable population? Use evidence to support the risk factors you have identified. |
Did not identified or described population supported by evidence. |
Poorly identified or described population supported by evidence. |
Vaguely identified or described population supported by evidence. |
Briefly identified or described population supported by evidence. |
Thoroughly identified or described population supported by evidence. |
|
3. Provide a review of literature from scholarly journals of evidence-based interventions that address the problem. After completing a library search related to effective interventions for your chosen health promotion activity, write a review that evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of all the sources you have found. You might consult research texts for information on how to write a review of the literature found in your search. |
Did not provide a review of literature from scholarly journals of evidence-based interventions that address the problem. |
Poorly provided a review of literature from scholarly journals of evidence-based interventions that address the problem.
|
Vaguely provided a review of literature from scholarly journals of evidence-based interventions that address the problem.
|
Briefly provided a review of literature from scholarly journals of evidence-based interventions that address the problem.
|
Thoroughly provided a review of literature from scholarly journals of evidence-based interventions that address the problem.
|
|
4. Select and present an appropriate health promotion/ disease prevention theoretical or conceptual model that best serves as the guiding framework for the proposal. |
Did not select and present an appropriate health promotion/ disease prevention theoretical or conceptual model |
Poorly selected and present an appropriate health promotion/ disease prevention theoretical or conceptual model |
Vaguely selected and present an appropriate health promotion/ disease prevention theoretical or conceptual model |
Briefly selected and present an appropriate health promotion/ disease prevention theoretical or conceptual model |
Thoroughly selected and present an appropriate health promotion/ disease prevention theoretical or conceptual model |
|
5. Provide an overview of your implementation plan complete with a summary of communication ideas and a timeline. |
Did not . provide an overview of your implementation plan complete with a summary of communication ideas and a timeline. |
Poorly provided an overview of your implementation plan complete with a summary of communication ideas and a timeline. |
Vaguely provided an overview of your implementation plan complete with a summary of communication ideas and a timeline. |
Briefly provided an overview of your implementation plan complete with a summary of communication ideas and a timeline. |
Thoroughly provided an overview of your implementation plan complete with a summary of communication ideas and a timeline. |
|
6.Thoroughly describe the intended outcomes. Describe the outcomes in detail concurrent with the SMART goal approach. |
Did not describe the intended outcomes. |
Poorly described the intended outcomes. |
Vaguely described the intended outcomes. |
Briefly described the intended outcomes. |
Thoroughly described the intended outcomes. Describe the outcomes in detail concurrent with the SMART goal approach. |
|
7. Provide a detailed plan for evaluation for each outcome. |
Did not. provide a detailed plan for evaluation for each outcome.
|
Poorly provided a plan for evaluation for each outcome. |
Vaguely provided a plan for evaluation for each outcome. |
Briefly provided a plan for evaluation for each outcome. |
Provided a detailed plan for evaluation for each outcome. |
|
8. Thoroughly describe possible barriers/ challenges to implementing the proposed project as well as strategies to address these barriers/ challenges. |
Did not describe possible barriers/ challenges to implementing the proposed project as well as strategies to address these barriers/ challenges. |
Poorly described possible barriers/ challenges to implementing the proposed project as well as strategies to address these barriers/ challenges. |
Vaguely described possible barriers/ challenges to implementing the proposed project as well as strategies to address these barriers/ challenges. |
Briefly described possible barriers/ challenges to implementing the proposed project as well as strategies to address these barriers/ challenges. |
Thoroughly described possible barriers/ challenges to implementing the proposed project as well as strategies to address these barriers/ challenges. |
|
Total Points |
___/32 |
|||||
Percent Accomplished |
___% |
|||||
A. Project Content Points (___% x 90 pts) |
___ pts |
|||||
B. Organization and Formatting
10 points possible |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
Score |
|
||||||
Organizes project and writes well. |
No project or paper submitted. |
Project was unorganized and poorly written. |
Project was somewhat organized and overall writing left room for improvement. |
Project was well-organized, but overall writing left room for improvement. |
Project was thoroughly organized and well-written. |
|
States ideas clearly and logically. |
No project or paper submitted. |
Ideas were not stated clearly or logically. |
Some ideas were stated clearly and logically. |
Most ideas were stated clearly and logically. |
All ideas were stated clearly and logically. |
|
Writes relevant content. |
No project or paper submitted. |
Project was off topic and not relevant. |
Some portions of project were on topic and relevant. |
Project was mostly on topic and relevant. |
Project was thoroughly on topic and relevant. |
|
|
||||||
Uses Course Policies formatting guidelines. |
No project or paper submitted. |
No formatting guidelines were followed. |
Some guidelines were followed. |
Most guidelines were followed. |
All formatting guidelines were followed and the template was used. |
|
Avoids spelling and grammatical errors. |
No project or paper submitted. |
Greater than 6 spelling or grammatical errors. |
4 to 6 spelling or grammatical errors. |
1 to 3 spelling or grammatical errors. |
No spelling or grammatical errors. |
|
|
Total Points |
___/10 |
||||
Percent Accomplished |
___% |
|||||
B. Organization and Formatting Points ( ___% 25 pts) |
___ pts |
|||||
Total Points: (A +B) / 100 |
___/100 |

We offer CUSTOM-WRITTEN, CONFIDENTIAL, ORIGINAL, and PRIVATE writing services. Kindly click on the ORDER NOW button to receive an A++ paper from our masters- and PhD writers.
Get a 10% discount on your order using the following coupon code SAVE10
Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper